68
Although the ruling will be non-binding, it could carry moral and political weight. Courts around the world may use it to support national climate lawsuits, and it may influence future treaty negotiations or United Nations frameworks.
Advertisement
Legal scholars believe the opinion could redefine the concept of environmental justice. If the court declares that states have binding obligations under international law to prevent climate harm, it could lead to reparations claims, more stringent emissions goals, and legal pressure on multinational corporations.
